Sunday, February 26, 2023

M3GAN

-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
-------------------------------------------------------------------

M3GAN                                                                       OK/G
It received a rating of 93% (as of this writing) out of roughly 300 critics on Rotten Tomatoes, there were memes created, and a sequel is already planned.  Surely there must be something special about this killer doll film, no?  I watched both the rated and unrated versions (both currently available on Peacock), and I usually like to watch the rated version first (if given the option since that’s what the general population is initially given).  There are only a few scenes (you can count them on one hand) that are a bit gorier in the unrated one, but there may have also been a few more “F” bombs, if I’m not mistaken.  In other words, go for the unrated version if you prefer your films a tad more violent.  [Sometimes an unrated version is completely different, such as Dead Alive, that zombie movie Peter Jackson did before The Lord of the Rings films, which was much, much gorier than the rated version, which I saw first].  The titular creation (the spelling is an acronym) comes about when a woman is forced to care for her niece and thereafter given an idea for a plaything (that being a 4-foot doll with sentient qualities).  As with all technology in entertainment that seems too good to be true, eventually bad things happen.  Do you think Megan goes after the ignorant neighbor and her aggressive dog, plus the bully of the little girl she’s created to protect?  Of course she does; it’s just a matter of how and when.  Although this is marketed as a killer doll flick, it’s more of a killer robot flick.  Whatever, it involves an item that kills.  Was it overrated?  Possibly, but not necessarily.  I enjoyed it, a little, for being nothing more than what it set out to be, but I don’t think it was anything super, super special.  2/25/2023

Bonus reviews:

From (Season One)
Ten-episode series on MGM+ (which I believe is the new Paramount+), all roughly 50-minutes each.  There’s a small town surrounded by woods wherein anyone who happens to enter it cannot leave (you try and you’ll just end up right back in town).  People stuck there have come from all over.  There are creatures that look like people until they attack that only come out at night.  Are they vampires?  Possibly; I don’t recall the name ever mentioned; they’re just labeled “monsters.”  You must be inside somewhere protected by a talisman that prevents them from entering.  Are these people in some kind of purgatory?  Like all of life’s questions, everyone in town has speculations.  There is a Stephen King quality to it all in that there are many characters we get to know that are stuck in a predicament.  It does drag at times (no surprise given there are ten episodes not much shorter than an hour a piece), but I never felt like I forced myself to continue, and I am curious as to what the big mystery is, which wasn’t revealed this season.  There is a season two coming this April, and I will tune in for at least one more round (two at the absolute most), but I hope they don’t plan on going longer than that.  2/22/2023

Sorority Babes in the Slimeball Bowl-O-Rama 2        EH
This is actually a sequel (released at the end of last year) to the 1988 film, as it refers to the events in it (providing a brief flashback), but I think it’s more of a remake.  Was it unnecessary?  Hell, to those that actually saw it, was the first movie even necessary?  [I know, are any movies really necessary?  All you do is sit on your ass.  On a side note---Static-X used a quote from the film on one of their Wisconsin Death Trip tracks].  With a title like that (I’m referring to the first here), I don’t think you’re supposed to take it seriously.  It (the predecessor) was slightly (I stress the word slightly) fun in that cheesy Eighties horror-comedy way, it involving babes in a sorority (no way, really?) initiating other babes, horny dudes that get caught spying on these babes, and the initiated babes forced to break into a bowling alley (again, really?) with these busted dudes to steal a trophy.  The trophy they happen to steal contains an imp that grants them all wishes, but, in the age-old ‘be careful what you wish for’ scenario, these wishes end up doing more harm than good (what do you expect from a demon?).  That imp is what I found most irking about the film despite being practical---he didn’t belong in a movie that should’ve been cheesy Eighties fun.  I think I would’ve enjoyed it more had the sorority babes and the horny dudes simply break into the bowling alley and just bowl in addition to doing typical cheesy Eighties movie stuff.  It was directed by David DeCoteau (a filmmaker with a slew of less-than-B-movies to his name) and featured recognizable B-movie actresses Linnea Quigley (Silent Night, Deadly Night; The Return of the Living Dead; Night of the Demons) and Brinke Stevens (The Slumber Party Massacre), the latter directing this sequel and making an appearance as her character from the first (I met her at my first horror convention years ago; nice lady).  This sequel follows the exact same formula with different performers (one being another recognizable face from Eighties films), a different bowling alley, and a slightly different imp (albeit with a similar persona---you’ll find out why); different sorority house too probably (hence why I say it’s more of a remake).  I think the only people that will watch this are those that have seen the first one and will do so out of curiosity (yours truly certainly was curious, especially for a sequel to a film like that made 34 years later!).  It is barely even an hour, but, if anything, I would just tell you to waste roughly 20 extra minutes with the predecessor, even though I would suggest spending your time with even better films than that.  2/19/2023

Other movies I've seen and their ratings (see above):

Boiling Point (2021)  >>>OK

The Fabelmans  >>>OK

#Float  >>>EH

House of Darkness (2016)  >>>EH

The Retaliators  >>>OK/G

The Strays  >>>OK/G
            (Netflix)

The Visitor (2022)  >>>EH/OK

---Sean O.
2/26/2023

No comments:

Post a Comment