Monday, December 23, 2019

I Spit on Your Grave: Deja Vu


-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
-------------------------------------------------------------------


I Spit on Your Grave:  Déjà Vu                                   OK
This is a direct sequel to the original I Spit on Your Grave and has no connection to the remake or its two sequels (you can read my reviews for the original film, the remake, and both sequels in one of my other blogs at---https://vampireclown82-2.blogspot.com/2017/09/i-spit-on-my-blog.html).  The director of the 1978 controversial cult classic, Meir Zarchi, also directed this sequel, so I expected it to be a little better than it was.  For those that haven’t seen the original I Spit on Your Grave, basically a female writer temporarily leaves the city for the countryside, is brutally raped/assaulted by four local men, and gets revenge on all four after being left for dead.  Said female writer, played by Camille Keaton in both films, wrote a book about her ordeal and now has a grown daughter.  I’m assuming since there’s a 40-year gap between the movies that the same amount of time passed in the movie world, but I’m unsure because none of the characters look old enough to be returning ones and one of the characters has a cell phone.  One character, claiming to be the father of one of the victims in the first film, wouldn’t have looked old enough to be the father if he was in the first film.  Camille certainly aged (it’s been 40 years after all), but still doesn’t look bad for her age, and I don’t think her daughter in the film is at least 40 (unless she also looks good for her age).  I guess I can overlook those questionable timeline/continuity issues (somewhat) and judge the movie on its primary merits…I guess.  Keep in mind that this is a 148-minute movie, which I thought was a typo initially, but it actually didn’t seem like it despite not needing to be that long.  And as much as I dislike both remakes and sequels (for the most part), I think I prefer sequels and like how this was one despite the four decade difference.  Anyway, relatives of the aforementioned victims from the first film abduct Camille’s character and her daughter because now they want revenge.  I don’t think I’m spoiling anything by saying something happens to both of them and the daughter then goes after the attackers one by one.  If this was about an hour shorter, it could’ve very well been a remake as it sure felt like one when she was seeking vengeance like her mother did in the first film (hence the Déjà Vu in the title).  One scene even tries to replicate the bathtub castration in a different location (not much for subtlety).  It’s pretty much the same movie, only longer, not as disturbing (the scene in Irreversible is the only time I’ve seen something come close to rivaling the brutal depictions of the first film), and tonally different (generally).  The rednecks may also be vile here, albeit not necessarily as creepy as the original group, going back to my ‘tonally different’ comment, just more irritating (almost making this sequel feel like a joke at times).  There is still violence for those wondering and those expecting it, and I feel I’m being a bit too lenient with my rating, but I rated it so for fans of the first that’ll likely just be curious (or have OCD like me in regards to watching movies), even though it may be an unnecessary sequel that’s not as gritty (or disturbingly compelling) as its predecessor and likely a “watch once and never again” film.  12/17/2019



Other movies and TV show(s) I’ve seen and their ratings (see above):

Holiday Rush  >>>EH/OK
            (Netflix)

Light of My Life  >>>OK/G

Lucky Day  >>>EH

Ronny Chieng:  Asian Comedian Destroys America!   >>>OK/G
            (Netflix)

Three Days of Christmas:  Season One  >>>OK
            (Netflix; In Spanish with subtitles)


---Sean O.
12/23/2019

Monday, December 16, 2019

Black Christmas


-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
-------------------------------------------------------------------


Black Christmas                                                          EH
I was very upset upon hearing this was the second (!) remake of Bob Clark’s seminal yuletide terror classic from 1974.  I was also bummed upon hearing it was rated PG-13!  Slasher movies can’t be PG-13!  One of the reasons we slasher fans like slasher movies are for the kills (in addition to the characters being likable and the villain being noteworthy).  I gave into seeing it (like always) because ‘tis the season and I needed a new holiday movie to watch.  I also went during a bargain time and I have an AMC gift card (yes, even when I have a gift card I still like to spend the least amount possible; I want to see as many free movies as I can).  I also watched the other two versions recently, so why stop?  Aside from a few references to the original film that true fans will notice, this really wasn’t a remake.  Essentially, any horror movie set around Christmastime could very well be called Black Christmas.  I would’ve been all for it being a reimagining instead of a remake (it worked for Child’s Play) if only it were a better movie.  It begins like a slasher movie, predictable at that, predictable in the sense they weren’t even trying.  When all is said and done, it’s more of a college conspiracy film, kind of akin to The Skulls more than the other two films bearing the same title, or any slasher film for that matter.  It’s also a message movie with a predominantly feminist slant.  It just didn’t work for me, not as a slasher film, not as a college conspiracy film, and not as a message movie.  My advice?  Just watch or re-watch Bob Clark’s film that’s still good 45 years later.  And if you’re feeling a bit extra festive, go ahead and watch the 2006 remake as well.  Coming from someone with OCD, you really don’t need to include this version in your marathon.  [You can read my reviews of the other two versions in one of my other blogs---https://vampireclown82-2.blogspot.com/2016/11/imdreaming-of-blackchristmas.html].  12/14/2019


Bonus review:


Once Upon a Time in Hollywood                               EH
This is the 9th film from Quentin Tarantino.  Tenth if you count Kill Bill, volumes 1 and 2, as separate movies (I, and mostly everyone else, count them as one).  Yes, I am a fan of Mr. Tarantino, the filmmaker who pretty much went to film school by working at a video store (those places were basically my education growing up).  Let’s see, I am a fan of Reservoir Dogs but don’t love it (I do own a shirt though that I got real cheap, so I like it enough).  I love Pulp Fiction (one of my favorite movies).  I like Jackie Brown, but it definitely wasn’t one of his best (he also had 2 previous films to live up to).  I am a fan of both volumes of Kill Bill, more so of the first volume.  I liked Death Proof, his half of Grindhouse.  Inglourious Basterds ended up being my favorite movie of the year it came out because I remember being engrossed the entire 2 ½ hours of mostly dialogue (something Quentin seems to excel at).  Django Unchained was good but felt as long as it actually was.  I did like The Hateful Eight, enough to make my ‘best of’ list that year, as it was an effective film using nonlinear techniques with several characters we got to know real well (both Tarantino-esque qualities as well).  Well, like they say (or someone said, I can’t really remember where it originated), every good director is entitled to at least one flop.  I’m not sure entitled is the correct word, but every good director is almost expected to make at least one flop, just like no musical artist is expected to have all good songs (even though, yes, everyone is different and tastes are subjective).  Anyway, I hate to say that I didn’t like this 9th (or 10th) film from Mr. Tarantino.  It was a big disappointment.  It could be that it didn’t really feel like a Tarantino film as well.  Much like the subject matter, it felt “too Hollywood” coming from a filmmaker of Quentin’s caliber.  It involves Leonardo DiCaprio as a western actor in the Sixties and the films-within-the-film he performed in did nothing but bog down the film we as an audience were watching.  I just didn’t see what was so compelling about watching him act as an actor in just parts of films-within-the-film.  None of the dialogue-heavy scenes (something Quentin normally excels at as I’ve said) were particularly striking either.  Oh, and the Manson family is involved too.  I think I’ve seen enough films featuring the man and his “family,” a recent one being Charlie Says which I wasn’t particularly a fan of.  I didn’t mind how Quentin rewrote some of history, many films based on fact are often fabricated anyway, and I enjoyed his signature use of violence utilized during that segment, but it wasn’t enough and was way too late to save the rest of the 161-minute feature.  Quentin, here’s to hoping your next film, which I hope isn’t Star Trek-related as has been rumored, picks you back up again.  I can momentarily forgive one misfire out of 9 (or 10) pictures.  12/14/2019



Other movies I've seen and their ratings (see above):

An Elephant Sitting Still  >>>OK/G

Hustlers  >>>EH

Night Hunter  >>>OK

A Score to Settle  >>>EH


---Sean O.
12/16/2019

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

It: Chapter Two/Frozen II


-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
-------------------------------------------------------------------


It:  Chapter Two                                                          EH/OK
Technically this isn’t a sequel, just one-half of a remake, since this and part one (chapter one) are one long movie released separately.  This chapter was 169 minutes, the first was 135, making it a little over 5 hours total.  The original was 192 minutes (not only do I know that because of my movie run-time obsession, but I also confirmed it by researching).  Of course I’m a big fan of the original It (which was actually a two-part TV movie).  I did read the long-ass book by Stephen King too, but only remember specific parts.  I did recommend the first part of this remake, mildly, but still thought it was way overrated (check out my review for it in the archives---www.abcreviewarchive.blogspot.com).  I didn’t care too much for this second chapter.  I absolutely had no problem with the adult cast of “The Loser Club” at all.  I did have a problem with all the CGI (I honestly don’t think I’m ever going to give in to modern cinematic technology).  I wasn’t a fan of any of the monstrosities (save for a giant statue---that was cool) and there came a time when I couldn’t wait for the movie to be over.  There’s an air of predictability at times too.  Since I’m a Stephen King completist (the man himself makes an appearance here, by the way), or film completist for that matter, I had to see this (and the first chapter) no matter what, as will any King completist since I don’t think your inner OCD will allow you not to (especially if you saw the first chapter).  This is just another remake though (as a whole) that will never live up to the original (in my opinion), and I don’t care what anyone says, but Tim Curry will always be Pennywise over this slobbering, mostly-CGI, multi-rowed toothy villain!  12/10/2019



Frozen II                                                                     OK
So here we are with round 2 of the Nordic-set Disney film featuring the two sisters, Anna and Elsa, a ginger and blonde, respectively; theatrically-released no less.  I did like Frozen as did many young and old, and I’m sure there were many a parent sick to death of that Idina Menzel-performed song that became very much a part of pop culture.  I’m admittedly a fan of it and there was even a worthy metal cover by a band called Betraying the Martyrs.  Ironically, “Let it Go” is a song about letting go of the past while this sequel involves righting a past mistake.  While the animation in this film looked great (no surprise considering the studio), I hate to say the story had the feel of an inferior direct-to-video sequel.  I was only a fan of one of the many songs which still wasn’t as good as “Let it Go.”  I know you shouldn’t compare to what came before, especially if what came before was a huge success, but shouldn’t any attempt always strive to be the best?  I hate to say I also didn’t care much for Olaf this time, who I actually was a fan of last time (his presence was more annoying here).  I hate to keep saying ‘I hate to say,’ but I hate to say I just wasn’t feeling it as much this time.  I suggest just checking it out on video (meaning DVD/Blu-ray/streaming/whatever) as it has that direct-to-video feel, like I said.  12/9/2019


---Sean O.
12/11/2019

Thursday, December 5, 2019

Ready or Not


-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
-------------------------------------------------------------------


Ready or Not                                                               G
…here I come, you can’t hide.  Gonna fiiiiiiiiind you and take it slowly…Sorry, had to get that Fugees song out of me as I instinctively sing a song internally or externally whenever its title and/or words are mentioned.  The title is in reference to the first words uttered while playing the traditional game of hide and seek, which the newly wedded bride in this film is forced to play as an initiation into her new rich family.  Tradition dictates the new in-law must compete from midnight to dawn on their wedding night in a game they (the new in-law) pick after inserting a card into a box.  The bride soon realizes she needs to survive this game until dawn.  Yes, her new family must kill her by dawn or something will supposedly happen to all of them.  What a lovely family to move into, no?  I don’t think I’m giving too much away since much of that was in the previews and can probably be read in any synopsis.  It could’ve been much goofier given the premise and although there are bits of comic relief, this is generally serious in tone and a bit darker than you’d expect.  There’s also a modicum of suspense and I don’t remember ever really being bored; it’s violent too when it wants to be.  I won’t reveal whether the bride loses or if something actually does befall the family if she doesn’t, but let’s just say I wasn’t exactly disappointed with the outcome.  It’s not great (it’s rare for films these days to be anyway) and probably not altogether fresh (also rare anymore), but I’m recommending it.  12/5/2019



Other movies I've seen and their ratings (see above):

Bunny Lake Is Missing  >>>G

Indian Horse  >>>G

Mary  >>>EH


---Sean O.
12/5/2019