Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Critters: A New Binge


-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
-------------------------------------------------------------------


Critters:  A New Binge                                                OK/G
Critters.  The franchise featuring those furry little aliens with rows of sharp teeth spanning four films from 1986 to 1992.  While it may not be the best franchise out there, it’s still enjoyable and better than other franchises like Ghoulies and maybe even Gremlins considering there were only two and the second one wasn’t that great.  I am a fan of Critters; it’s a fun ‘80’s sci-fi romp.  Critters 2:  The Main Course naturally wasn’t as good but definitely a worthy follow-up.  Critters 3 was decent for a threequel but obviously didn’t hold a candle to the first two (Leonardo DiCaprio’s first film too for those unaware).  Critters 4 was, well…my least favorite of the series (the longest one too!) and not because it was set in space.  If I can say anything positive about it, it wasn’t the worst movie I’ve seen, nor the worst space-set movie I’ve seen.  In other words, I like the films best in chronological order.  One thing I do love about the franchise, the creatures in particular, which is indicative of the time they were released, is the practical designs.  With all the CGI crap out there now, it always elates me to watch older films (or even modern ones) with practical effects/creatures.  I absolutely do not hate the creatures, especially in the first two, and no surprise given the legendary Chiodo Brothers (Killer Klowns from Outer Space) were behind them (all four films).  Anyway, this new series available on Shudder consists of 8 scant episodes totaling roughly 74 minutes, making the longest one 11 minutes.  I understand that format may work for those with short attention spans and someone that may want to catch an episode during their paid break, but why couldn’t they just make it a 74-minute movie?  Aside from that questionable presentation, the content itself was more or less the same way I felt about Critters 3---it was a decent addition to the franchise but not something I’d rave about.  That’s not to say it wasn’t fun, it was, plus there’re a few bloody moments and the episodes unsurprisingly whiz by; there’s also a clever yet idiosyncratic twist I never would’ve expected (which may kickstart a whole new storyline given another sequel was suggested at the end).  Thankfully this wasn’t a remake either (an unfortunate commonality these days) despite containing a direct homage to Critters 2.  At least the creatures are practical too (a rarity these days) despite looking different, no surprise considering the Chiodo Brothers weren’t involved, but some of the splatter effects were obviously digital.  I also didn’t care for the Critters being given more characterization this time, although it may have been necessary in regards to that aforementioned twist.  This is very much only for Critters fans not expecting much from this type of fare to begin with, but you don’t necessarily have to see the films before watching this even though I suggest you do so your expectations aren’t that high and you may appreciate the older entries more.  4/22/2019


Bonus review:


Escape Room                                                              OK/G
I think the very notion of an Escape Room has been worn out already.  There’s been at least one other movie with the same title and concept released within the past year (check out my review for it in the archives---www.abcreviewarchive.blogspot.com), and I’m tired of hearing about the real ones that seem to be popping up every which way.  No, I’ve never been in one and don’t really have a desire to.  I have no patience and I’m not too good at figuring out riddles under pressure (I’d need ample time alone since my brain always has several tabs open at once), but my Mom brought it up recently so I have a feeling I might partake in one eventually.  Anyway, this new film about a group of six people partaking in a deadly Escape Room actually wasn’t bad and generally had my attention.  It’s kind of like a Saw film but not quite, maybe more like Cube from what I recall, although this was probably more elaborate.  It does, however, get a bit conventional towards the end and I was kind of hoping for a revelation I anticipated may have happened but didn’t.  All in all though, you could do much worse.  4/23/2019

Other movies I've seen and their ratings (see above):


Between Worlds  >>>EH/OK

Capernaum  >>>G/VG

Destroyer  >>>OK

Horror Noire:  A History of Black Horror  >>>OK/G

Nancy Drew and the Hidden Staircase  >>>OK

The Night Before Halloween  >>>B

The Quake  >>>EH/OK

Show Pieces  >>>OK

The Sisterhood of Night  >>>EH/OK

The Vanishing (2019)  >>>OK

---Sean O.
4/24/2019

Monday, April 15, 2019

The Silence


-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
-------------------------------------------------------------------


The Silence                                                                  OK
Another post-apocalyptic film?!  A Quiet Place, Bird Box, Ravenous, and How It Ends are just a few of the many recent titles coming to mind.  This one, available on Netflix like three of those films, stars Stanley Tucci and “Sabrina” (Kiernan Shipka) and is based on a book by Tim Lebbon, an author whom I’ve read several titles of, not this one.  It resembles A Quiet Place the most as the creatures here are attracted to sound and can’t see.  (Like I wondered in A Quiet Place, how do these people go to the bathroom if they have to worry about noise?).  The creatures in this film, called Vesps, resemble Pterodactyls with the mouth of a T-Rex (kinda).  In other words, they can tear you apart as evidenced at times.  I didn’t hate them but still think they belonged in a subpar SyFy channel movie.  I did like them better than the creatures in A Quiet Place which, if you recall from my review (if not, check out my archives at www.abcreviewarchive.blogspot.com), was what ruined A Quiet Place for me.  As for whether you should spend time watching this particular post-apocalyptic film, I’m not entirely sure.  If you love post-apocalyptic films as a subgenre, are a fan of Tim Lebbon or “Sabrina,” I’d say go ahead.  I, for one, didn’t hate it, thought a few parts were actually cleverly written, and might’ve enjoyed it more than A Quiet Place (I also didn’t expect much from this entry either), but I don’t think I’ll watch it again.  Also, I thought it was a bit short, but I’m unsure if that’s actually a criticism because had it been longer, I might’ve complained about that.  4/15/2019


Bonus review:


Kittie:  Origins/Evolutions                                           G
I’ve been a metalhead since 7th grade (I’m 36 now).  When Kittie came out around the millennium, not too many women (let alone all-girl bands) were in metal.  Unfortunately, whenever you’re in an industry wherein you don’t fall into the majority (in metal, straight white males, emphasis on the male), you’re always going to stand out.  Sure, there were all-girl bands like L7 and Drain STH at the time, but they weren’t nearly as heavy, or at least consistently heavy, the former being more punkish and the latter having an equal amount of soft/heavy songs and not gaining as much popularity despite playing Ozzfest twice!  I remember someone saying at the time in a magazine that Kittie became popular solely for being girls and wouldn’t have been if they were dudes playing the same songs.  That may be (refer back to my majority comment), but at least Kittie were good.  I was a big fan of their first album (Spit) pretty much in its entirety and liked their second album (Oracle) enough (though not as much) to still consider myself a fan, enough to get a band T-shirt that I still have (I also saw them at Ozzfest 2000 which was the first one I attended).  By the time their third album came out (Until the End), they started to sound weaker but I thought they were still okay.  They got worse after that, making me lose interest and thus faded away, only coming to mind when mentioned or while wearing the band T-shirt.  When I heard of this documentary covering their entire career (in a little more than 90 minutes), I was definitely interested.  I always like to read/see interviews of bands even if I’m not a fan, more so if I actually am/was a fan, because I like when artists are given human qualities.  Seeing this definitely brought back memories (nostalgia!); it seems like many of my best memories involve entertainment (introvert!), and ironically, the coverage on albums when I wasn’t a fan were the least interesting parts of the film, but I still wanted to keep watching.  My rating is for fellow Kittie fans (now or ever), as I would imagine they’d be the most interested in checking this out, but if you’re interested in any kind of musical history, are a feminist, or open-minded, I’m not discouraging you from tuning in either!  4/13/2019



Other movies I've seen and their ratings (see above):

Blood Fest  >>>EH

Everfall  >>>G

Mail Order Monster  >>>EH/OK

68 Kill  >>>OK/G


---Sean O.
4/15/2019

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Unearthed & Untold: The Path to Pet Sematary


-------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Unearthed & Untold:  The Path to Pet Sematary       G
Seeing as the remake was just released, and no, I’m in no rush to see it even though I will eventually (unfortunately) and try as I may to keep an open mind when I do (as hard as it will be), I felt it was the perfect time to see this documentary on the making of the original film that’s currently available on Tubi (an app/channel that offers free movies and TV shows, F.Y.I.).  Pet Sematary is one of the first Stephen King-based adaptations I saw as a preteen when initially developing an interest in the author, and while it did disturb me, I loved it and it will always hold a special place in my heart.  I have read the book (years later) and do remember it being different (as many of his stories and adapted works are) and more disturbing in the psychological sense since you were actually inside Louis Creed’s head.  I like the movie more though (part of it could be nostalgia, yes) and liked the sequel enough.  I don’t think I need to repeat how much I dislike remakes if you’ve ever read any of my reviews before (in case, I don’t like remakes; I find the majority, if not all, of them unnecessary).  Granted, there are some that I didn’t hate, maybe even liked---The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Dawn of the Dead, Piranha, Children of the Corn, House of Wax, I Spit on Your Grave, Silent Night, The Last House on the Left, Night of the Living Dead, My Bloody Valentine, etc.---but I still prefer the original (at least the one I saw first) the majority of the time.  I’m baffled at all the love, even from Mr. Stephen King himself, the Pet Sematary remake has received so far; or at the love given to any remake that wasn’t that great (It being one coming to mind).  They’re all just encouraging more remakes!  [I hate that Pet Sematary is now another film I have to say ‘the original’ in front of when referencing it!].  Anyway, this documentary makes no mention of the remake (as this was initially released 2 years ago).  I’m sure many of the information provided here could’ve been found in a book or somewhere on the World Wide Web, but not everyone likes to read and, arguably, sometimes it’s easier to retain information when there’s a visual accompaniment.  I, myself, actually learned a thing or two, including a certain star being a twin and how specific set locations were altered.  I did already know that a certain character wasn’t played by their assumed gender (I won’t reveal who in case some of you actually don’t know).  Part of the appeal in being a film fan, horror especially, is talking to like-minded individuals and seeing documentaries like this is very similar since you’re seeing and hearing others talk about the film(s) you like.  It’s hard to say if this is the definitive documentary on the film, but they did manage to get quite a few interviews, including minor characters like those playing Jud and Rachel as children.  I can imagine fans of the original Pet Sematary would be the most interested, although I wouldn’t exclude those with a general interest in filmmaking or those with open minds either.  My rating is for Pet Sematary (the original) fans though, or Stephen King completists.  4/10/2019


Bonus review:


The Dirt                                                                       G
Despite the voiceover in the beginning stating the Eighties was a terrible decade, I actually dig a lot of the music and movies from that decade.  Of course I may have more of an appreciation since I was born in 1982 and wasn’t quite old enough to enjoy much during the actual time.  Hair metal was one of the musical subgenres then, which generally consisted of androgynous members, usually men (although there were a few female hair bands, i.e. Vixen and Lita Ford).  Yes, I’m a fan.  This Netflix biopic covers Motley Crue during their formative years up to the Nineties.  While I do like enough songs to call myself somewhat of a fan, I was never into them as much as other hair bands like Twisted Sister, Guns N’ Roses, Poison, and Bon Jovi; and since I never extensively followed them, I didn’t know everything about them other than what they became notorious for (i.e. trashing hotel rooms and doing drugs---but how many similar bands can you not say that about?).  That being said, I can’t say how much truth there was to any of this, but the original band members had a hand in the production so there has to be some truth to it, right?  Seeing it received 40% on Rotten Tomatoes based on 62 critics though, maybe others knew more than I did?  (There’s a rather vulgar scene involving Ozzy that I actually believe could’ve happened, but I wonder if it actually did because I don’t remember hearing about it).  Despite containing the same ingredients for a general rock biopic (forming a band, touring, dealing with personal issues, hitting rock bottom, picking themselves up again) and some questionable casting choices (Machine Gun Kelly, Pete Davidson), all I know is that I saw a raw and often fun film about a bunch of “wild” boys that was likely all the more interesting being based on a real band known for its infamy.  I actually enjoyed this more than Bohemian Rhapsody.  4/10/2019



Other movies I've seen and their ratings (see above):

Exposure  >>>OK

The Favourite  >>>EH

HIM  >>>B

Mercy Black  >>>EH

Mirai  >>>OK/G

Mortal Engines  >>>EH

A Place in Hell  >>>EH

Primal Rage  >>>G

Unicorn Store  >>>EH/OK


---Sean O.
4/11/2019

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Dumbo


--------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you haven’t seen the intro from my entry dated 1/26/19 (it’s in my archives whenever you want to read it), I’m no longer going to review every single movie I see.  I’m going to review one, with the occasional bonus, and just give ratings for the rest from now on (unless I decide to pick it up again in the future).  You can always ask me why I gave the ratings for the films without reviews though (via comments or the e-mail addresses under the ‘About Me’ section).
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Dumbo                                                                                    EH
Dumbo is one of my favorite Disney movies (at least more so when I was much younger) and Tim Burton is one of my favorite directors, so nothing (including mixed reviews) was going to stop me from seeing this live-action remake (apparently this is the only time its ever been remade too) as much as I dislike remakes (in case you’ve never heard me mention it numerous times before), and as much as I dislike CGI (in case you’ve never heard me mention it numerous times before).  The CGI elephants did look very close to being realistic though (I would hope so considering Tim Burton’s stature).  I hate to say it, but this film was flat and actually bored me a couple times.  The original animated film was a scant 64 minutes while this update was almost 2 hours, so you  can imagine all that extra time being filled, namely with more human characterizations.  There was more excitement crammed into the 64-minute animated film and all the emotional scenes this time failed to move me.  I’m sure every Tim Burton fan (like myself) would love for him to make another Edward Scissorhands, Sleepy Hollow, or Sweeney Todd, but we’ll settle for the Big Fish, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, and even Big Eyes, as long as they’re good.  This, unfortunately, is just another unnecessary remake which I would’ve been in no hurry to see (bargain times or not) had there been a different director at the helm.  Tim Burton, you need a comeback!  4/2/2019

Bonus review:


Seven in Heaven                                                          G
This begins like a regular teen movie with the obligatory house party before becoming an “alternate reality” film with a hidden closet in a bedroom acting as the interdimensional portal.  [For those unaware, ‘Seven Minutes in Heaven’ traditionally involves a boy and girl going into a closet together for seven minutes if they refuse to make out during a party game, i.e. ‘Spin the Bottle’].  It’s similar to The Jacket in premise only whereas that film jumped between years while this film stayed on the same date in different parallel realities.  The reasoning behind the closet’s “gateway” ability is inexplicable, although an utterly preposterous theory is suggested (aren’t they usually in stories like this?) that it might as well be inexplicable.  I wish the premise was expanded upon, which it very well could’ve been, but I enjoyed this enough to warrant a recommendation.  Plus, it’s really well-shot with great use of lighting, especially red, and could very well pass as a dark Twilight Zone episode (feature length of course).  4/2/2019



Other movies I've seen and their ratings (see above):

Beneath the Leaves  >>>OK

London Fields  >>>B

The Mule  >>>EH/OK

The Nutcracker and the Four Realms   >>>OK


---Sean O.
4/3/2019